<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ISPRS-Annals</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ISPRS-Annals</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2194-9050</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-1-W1-99-2017</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>TIMESTAMP OFFSET DETERMINATION BETWEEN AN ACTUATED LASER SCANNER AND ITS CORRESPONDING MOTOR</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Voges</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wieghardt</surname>
<given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wagner</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Real Time Systems Group, Institute for Systems Engineering, Leibniz Universität Hannover, D-30167 Hannover, Germany</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>30</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>IV-1/W1</volume>
<fpage>99</fpage>
<lpage>106</lpage>
<permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/isprs-annals-IV-1-W1-99-2017.html">This article is available from https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/isprs-annals-IV-1-W1-99-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/isprs-annals-IV-1-W1-99-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/isprs-annals-IV-1-W1-99-2017.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Motor actuated 2D laser scanners are key sensors for many robotics applications that need wide ranging but low cost 3D data. There
exist many approaches on how to build a 3D laser scanner using this technique, but they often lack proper synchronization for the
timestamps of the actuator and the laser scanner. However, to transform the measurement points into three-dimensional space an
appropriate synchronization is mandatory. Thus, we propose two different approaches to accomplish the goal of calculating timestamp
offsets between laser scanner and motor prior to and after data acquisition. Both approaches use parts of a SLAM algorithm but apply
different criteria to find an appropriate solution. While the approach for offset calculation prior to data acquisition exploits the fact
that the SLAM algorithm should not register motion for a stationary system, the approach for offset calculation after data acquisition
evaluates the perceived clarity of a point cloud created by the SLAM algorithm. Our experiments show that both approaches yield
the same results although operating independently on different data, which demonstrates that the results reflect reality with a high
probability. Furthermore, our experiments exhibit the significance of a proper synchronization between laser scanner and actuator.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="8"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>
