<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ISPRS-Annals</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ISPRS-Annals</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2194-9050</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-671-2020</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>COMPARISON OF SUBAQUATIC DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS FROM AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING AND IMAGERY</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mulsow</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mandlburger</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maas</surname>
<given-names>H.-G.</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9034-3469</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, TU Wien, Austria</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>3</label>
<addr-line>Institute of Photogrammetry, University of Stuttgart, Germany</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>03</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>V-2-2020</volume>
<fpage>671</fpage>
<lpage>677</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2020 C. Mulsow et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/V-2-2020/671/2020/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-671-2020.html">This article is available from https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/V-2-2020/671/2020/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-671-2020.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/V-2-2020/671/2020/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-671-2020.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/V-2-2020/671/2020/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-671-2020.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>The paper describes and compares the workflows and results of generating digital elevation models (DEMs) of underwater areas from airborne laser scanning and aerial stereo images. Based on a combined laser scanning/image data set of an artificial lake, both methods are described and pros/cons are highlighted. The authors focus on the final results, especially on accuracy, completeness and spatial resolution of the underwater DEM’s. Further, practical aspects of processing and complexity of both methods are highlighted too.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="7"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>