ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Download
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Articles | Volume V-3-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-193-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-193-2022
17 May 2022
 | 17 May 2022

AI-DRIVEN MAIZE YIELD FORECASTING USING UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE-BASED HYPERSPECTRAL AND LIDAR DATA FUSION

K. Dilmurat, V. Sagan, and S. Moose

Keywords: Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), Machine Learning, Remote Sensing, LiDAR, Hyperspectral, Data Fusion

Abstract. The increased availability of remote sensing data combined with the wide-ranging applicability of artificial intelligence has enabled agriculture stakeholders to monitor changes in crops and their environment frequently and accurately. Applying cutting-edge technology in precision agriculture also enabled the prediction of pre-harvest yield from standing crop signals. Forecasting grain yield from standing crops benefits high-throughput plant phenotyping and agriculture policymaking with information on where crop production is likely to decline. Advanced developments in the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) platform and sensor technologies aided high-resolution spatial, spectral, and structural data collection processes at a relatively lower cost and shorter time. In this study, UAV-based LiDAR and hyperspectral images were collected during the growing season of 2020 over a cornfield near Urbana Champaign, Illinois, USA. Hyperspectral imagery-based canopy spectral & texture features and LiDAR point cloud-based canopy structure features were extracted and, along with their combination, were used as inputs for maize yield prediction under the H2O Automated Machine Learning framework (H2O-AutoML). The research results are (1) UAV Hyperspectral imagery can successfully predict maize yield with relatively decent accuracies; additionally, LiDAR point cloud-based canopy structure features are found to be significant indicators for maize yield prediction, which produced slightly poorer, yet comparable results to hyperspectral data; (2) regardless of machine learning methods, integration of hyperspectral imagery-based canopy spectral and texture information with LiDAR-based canopy structure features outperformed the predictions when using a single sensor alone; (3)the H2O-AutoML framework presented to be an efficient strategy for machine learning-based data-driven model building.