<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ISPRS-Annals</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ISPRS-Annals</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2194-9050</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-247-2022</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SEVERAL SLFN-BASED CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS FOR URBAN AND RURAL LAND USE</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xie</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cai</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Key Laboratory of Surveying and Mapping Science and Geospatial Information Technology, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing, 100036, China</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>3</label>
<addr-line>Institute of Geodesy, University of Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>17</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>V-3-2022</volume>
<fpage>247</fpage>
<lpage>253</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2022 Y. Lin et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/V-3-2022/247/2022/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-247-2022.html">This article is available from https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/V-3-2022/247/2022/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-247-2022.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/V-3-2022/247/2022/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-247-2022.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/V-3-2022/247/2022/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-247-2022.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>In the study of urban sustainable development, accurate classification of land use has become an important basis for monitoring urban dynamic changes. Hence it is necessary to develop the appropriate recognition model for urban-rural land use. Although deep learning algorithms have become a research hotspot in image classification tasks in recent years, and many good results have been achieved. But other machine learning algorithms are not going away. Compared deep learning with machine learning, there are some advantages and disadvantages in data dependence, hardware dependence, feature processing, problem solving methods, execution time, and interpretability, etc. Especially in the classification for remote sensing images, the continuous research and development of traditional machine learning algorithms is still of great significance. In this paper, the performances of several SLFN-based classification algorithms were studied and compared, including ELM, RBF K-ELM, mixed K-ELM, A-ELM and SVM. Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) is a new algorithm for single-hidden-layer feedforward neural network (SLFN). It has simple structure, fast speed and is easy to train. In some applications, however, standard ELM is prone to be overfitting and its performance will be affected seriously when outliers exist. In order to explore the performance of ELM and its improved algorithm for urban-rural land use classification, comparative experiments between three improved ELM algorithms (RBF K-ELM, mixed K-ELM and A-ELM), ELM and SVM with image data from several study areas were performed, and the classification accuracy and efficiency were analysed. The results show that the three improved ELM algorithms perform better than the standard ELM and SVM both in overall accuracy and Kappa coefficient. However, it is worth noting that the computation efficiency of RBF K-ELM and mixed K-ELM decreases greatly with larger image, the time cost is much more than other algorithms. Compared with other algorithms, A-ELM has the advantages of higher Overall Accuracy and less classification time.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="7"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>