ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Download
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Articles | Volume X-4/W1-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-699-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-699-2023
14 Jan 2023
 | 14 Jan 2023

A QUICK SEASONAL DETECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF INTERNATIONAL SHADEGAN WETLAND WATER BODY EXTENT USING GOOGLE EARTH ENGINE CLOUD PLATFORM

S. M. Seyed Mousavi and M. Akhoondzadeh

Keywords: GEE, MNDWI, Shadegan Wetland, Sentinel-2, histogram analysis, random forest

Abstract. Understanding the variation of Water Extent (WE) can provide insights into Wetland conservation and management. In this study, and-inter inner-annual variations of WE were analyzed during 2019–2021 to understand the spatiotemporal changes of the International Shadegan Wetland, Iran. We utilized a thresholding process on Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI) to extract the WE quickly and accurately using the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform. The water surface analysis showed that: (1) WE had a downward trend from 2019 to 2021, with the overall average WE being 1405.23 km2; (2) the water area reached its peak due to the water supply to International Shadegan Wetland through the Jarahi River and upstream reservoirs at the end of 2019 and the beginning of 2020, and the largest water body appeared in Winter 2019, reaching 1953.31 km2. In contrast, the smallest water body appeared in Autumn 2021, reaching 563.56 km2; (3) The WE of the wetland showed predictable seasonal characteristics. The water area in Winter was the largest, with an average value of 1829.1 km2, while it was the smallest in Summer, with an average value of 1100.3 km2; (4) The average water area in 2019 was 1490.5 km2 whereas in 2020 and 2021 decreased by 9% and 25%, respectively, and reached 968.6 km2 and 811.9 km2. Finally, to evaluate the proposed model, its results were compared with the Random Forest (RF) classification results. Accordingly, Histogram Analysis (HA) classification achieved 94.6% of the average overall accuracy and the average Kappa coefficient of 0.93, but the RF method obtained 95.38% of the average overall accuracy and an average Kappa coefficient of 0.94.