<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ISPRS-Annals</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ISPRS-Annals</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2194-9050</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-79-2023</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MACHINE LEARNING CLASSIFIERS FOR CROP TYPE MAPPING USING VEGETATION INDICES</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Asgari</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hasanlou</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>

</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7254-4475</ext-link></contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>School of Surveying and Geospatial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>13</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>X-4/W1-2022</volume>
<fpage>79</fpage>
<lpage>85</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 S. Asgari</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-79-2023.html">This article is available from https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-79-2023.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-79-2023.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-79-2023.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Timely and accurate mapping of crops is crucial for agriculture management, policy-making, and food security. Due to the differences in the product calendars of various crops, it is possible to classify them by investigating the remote sensing Vegetation Indices (VIs) during crop growth season. This study developed a VI-based mapping approach to specifying crop types based on phenological and spectral metrics derived from the sentinel-2 images. We used six spectral VIs (ARVI, CVI, EVI, LAI, GLI, and NDVI) in three supervised machine learning methods, including Random Forest (RF), GBoost (GB), and K-Nearest Neighborhood (KNN) for crop mapping. Field data consisting of wheat, barley, canola, vegetables, and a bare land class, were collected as the testing and training data set. The classification results were evaluated through test samples showing high overall accuracy (OA) and satisfactory class accuracies for the most dominant crop types across different fields despite the variability of planting and harvesting dates. Among the VIs utilized to crop mapping, the Atmospherically Resistant Vegetation Index (ARVI) in all three classification methods achieved better results. The overall accuracy of RF, GB, and KNN models with the ARVI index was 95%, 88%, and 90%, respectively.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="7"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>
