<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ISPRS-Annals</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ISPRS-Annals</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2194-9050</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W8-2025-721-2026</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>The CNN-Transformers Crossroads, Comparing RT-DETR and YOLOv12 for Small object detection in remote sensing images</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Solatinia</surname>
<given-names>Behnam</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Niazmardi</surname>
<given-names>Saeid</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alipour Fard</surname>
<given-names>Tayeb</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4777-0128</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Department of Surveying Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Surveying Engineering, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>29</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>X-4/W8-2025</volume>
<fpage>721</fpage>
<lpage>727</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2026 Behnam Solatinia et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/X-4-W8-2025/721/2026/isprs-annals-X-4-W8-2025-721-2026.html">This article is available from https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/X-4-W8-2025/721/2026/isprs-annals-X-4-W8-2025-721-2026.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/X-4-W8-2025/721/2026/isprs-annals-X-4-W8-2025-721-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/X-4-W8-2025/721/2026/isprs-annals-X-4-W8-2025-721-2026.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Detecting small objects in remote sensing images has always been a challenge. The Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Transformer-based networks are two prominent categories of deep learning models used to address this challenge. Recently, combining both architectures has emerged to improve detection performance. However, a direct comparison between the leading standard models representing these architectures has yet to be conducted. In this study, we provided a performance comparison of two state-of-the-art detectors: YOLOv12, a CNN-based model with an attention mechanism, and RT-DETR, a transformer-based model built on a CNN backbone. We fine-tuned both algorithms on a custom remote sensing dataset containing small objects (airplanes and cars) and evaluated their performance based on precision, recall, F1-score, and training time. The results showed that YOLOv12 was significantly faster to train and achieved higher precision. These qualities make it a better choice for applications where minimizing false positives is critical. RT-DETR, with high recall and F1-score, was more effective at detecting a larger number of small objects. This analysis offers valuable insights into the trade-offs between these two architectures and serves as a guideline for selecting the appropriate model for each specific remote sensing task.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="7"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>