<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ISPRS-Annals</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ISPRS-Annals</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2194-9050</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/isprs-annals-XI-3-2026-1-2026</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Learning from Maps to Update Them: A Deep Learning-Based Approach Using Multimodal Airborne Data</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anjanappa</surname>
<given-names>Geethanjali</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Oude Elberink</surname>
<given-names>Sander</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Department of Earth Observation Science, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, The Netherlands</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>08</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>XI-3-2026</volume>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<lpage>9</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2026 Geethanjali Anjanappa</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/XI-3-2026/1/2026/isprs-annals-XI-3-2026-1-2026.html">This article is available from https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/XI-3-2026/1/2026/isprs-annals-XI-3-2026-1-2026.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/XI-3-2026/1/2026/isprs-annals-XI-3-2026-1-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/XI-3-2026/1/2026/isprs-annals-XI-3-2026-1-2026.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Automatic updating of topographic maps remains a significant challenge, as current workflows still rely heavily on manual interpretation of airborne data. This study proposes a method for identifying topographic changes by learning object representations from existing maps and using them as reference data for change detection. Map-derived labels are used to train independent 2D and 3D segmentation networks that generate semantic predictions from orthoimages and point clouds. Unlike conventional change-detection approaches that require temporally aligned datasets of the same modality, the proposed method directly compares newly acquired airborne data with existing map vectors. Semantic predictions from both modalities are vectorized and selectively fused into polygon geometries, which are subsequently compared with reference map vectors to identify object-level &amp;ldquo;from&amp;ndash;to&amp;rdquo; changes. The workflow highlights potential change regions and their predicted semantic classes, allowing operators to focus inspection on relevant areas rather than the entire dataset. Detected changes include both real-world developments, such as new construction and demolitions, and inconsistencies in the reference map caused by outdated or inaccurate delineations. To assess the effect of multimodal integration, the workflow is compared with a 2D-only baseline. The results indicate that integrating 3D geometric information can reduce noisy detections and improve the spatial consistency of candidate change objects, particularly for water and bridge classes.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="9"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>