THE EFFECT OF WIND ON TREE STEM PARAMETER ESTIMATION USING TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING

14 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Vegetation Analyses with a Special Focus on Savannas T. Muumbe et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030507
2. Reliable Estimates of Merchantable Timber Volume from Terrestrial Laser Scanning D. Panagiotidis & A. Abdollahnejad https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13183610
3. The Comparison of Stem Curve Accuracy Determined from Point Clouds Acquired by Different Terrestrial Remote Sensing Methods M. Hunčaga et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172739
4. Forest above-ground volume assessments with terrestrial laser scanning: a ground-truth validation experiment in temperate, managed forests M. Demol et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcab110
5. Terrestrial laser scanning in forest ecology: Expanding the horizon K. Calders et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112102
6. Reducing wind effects in multi-scan terrestrial laser scanning point clouds of trees combining LiDAR simulation and deep learning H. Weiser et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpag068
7. Kriging prediction of stand-level forest information using mobile laser scanning data adjusted for nondetection S. Saarela et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2017-0019
8. Laser scanning of high frequency tree movement T. de Jong et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ae9b37
9. Mobile Laser Scanning for Estimating Tree Structural Attributes in a Temperate Hardwood Forest B. Vandendaele et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14184522
10. A novel method for ULS-TLS forest point cloud registration based on height context descriptor X. Dai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fecs.2025.100369
11. Improving TLS-based stem volume estimates by field measurements T. Pitkänen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105882
12. Modeling a new taper curve and form factor of tree branches using terrestrial laser scanning M. Bazezew et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpad064
13. Terrestrial laser scanning: a new standard of forest measuring and modelling? M. Åkerblom & P. Kaitaniemi https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcab111
14. Comparing airborne laser scanning and UAV photogrammetry for estimating aboveground biomass of individual urban trees in Helsinki O. Shafaat et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128936