ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Download
Share
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share
Articles | Volume XI-3-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-XI-3-2026-279-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-XI-3-2026-279-2026
08 Jul 2026
 | 08 Jul 2026

SpectralNet-X: Transformer-based Lossy Compression for Hyperspectral Satellite Data

Jannik Sheikh, Jannick Kuester, Wolfgang Gross, Andreas Michel, and Martin Weinmann

Keywords: Hyperspectral Data Compression, Lossy Data Compression, Remote Sensing, Deep Learning, Satellite Data, Transformer

Abstract. Hyperspectral satellite missions generate massive data volumes that are difficult to transmit and store, making effective lossy compression a key enabling technology. We propose SpectralNet-X, a transformer-based autoencoder for spectral-only compression of spaceborne hyperspectral imagery at a fixed compression ratio of 16. The encoder maps each spectrum to a low-dimensional latent code using a 1D convolutional projection followed by stacked self-attention layers with rotary position embeddings and cross-attention pooling. The decoder reconstructs full-band spectra through an upsampling stack and per-band affine calibration. To improve reconstruction fidelity and generalization, SpectralNet-X is first pretrained via masked-signal reconstruction inspired by SimMIM and then fine-tuned with a mixed objective combining mean-squared error and spectral angle mapper (SAM) terms using a scheduled weighting scheme. We evaluate SpectralNet-X on the large-scale HySpecNet–11k benchmark and in a cross-sensor transfer setting, where models trained on HySpecNet–11k are tested on PRISMA hyperspectral scenes. Compared to three compression autoencoders, SpectralNet-X achieves the lowest angular reconstruction errors while maintaining competitive distortion metrics and substantially reducing the fraction of spectra with large SAM outliers. This study evaluates learned spectral compression under a normalized post-correction setting rather than in an end-to-end operational onboard radiance-preservation pipeline. The experiments rely on L2A and radiometrically corrected products rather than raw at-sensor radiances, so narrow atmospheric absorption features and residual Fraunhofer-line effects are not represented as in a true onboard scenario. The presented results should therefore be interpreted as evidence for learned spectral reconstruction under a controlled post-correction setting, not yet as direct validation for operational onboard deployment.

Share