PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ACCURACY AND MODELING OF ROLLING SHUTTER CAMERAS

27 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Study of the Precise Determination of Pipeline Geometries Using UAV Scanning Compared to Terrestrial Scanning, Aerial Scanning and UAV Photogrammetry G. Lenda et al. 10.3390/s23198257
2. Characterization of soil deformation due to blast-induced liquefaction by UAV-based photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning A. Pesci et al. 10.1080/01431161.2018.1484960
3. Assessment of the Steering Precision of a UAV along the Flight Profiles Using a GNSS RTK Receiver O. Lewicka et al. 10.3390/rs14236127
4. Low-Cost UAV in Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing: Georeferencing, DEM Accuracy, and Geospatial Analysis M. Sohl & S. Mahmood 10.1007/s41651-024-00176-2
5. Assessment of UAV-photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation of ground control points P. Martínez-Carricondo et al. 10.1016/j.jag.2018.05.015
6. Experimental Tests and Simulations on Correction Models for the Rolling Shutter Effect in UAV Photogrammetry N. Bruno & G. Forlani 10.3390/rs15092391
7. Object Distance Estimation Using a Single Image Taken from a Moving Rolling Shutter Camera N. Kim et al. 10.3390/s20143860
8. Generation of Virtual Ground Control Points Using a Binocular Camera A. Vazquez-Dominguez et al. 10.3390/drones8050195
9. Greenness Indices from a Low-Cost UAV Imagery as Tools for Monitoring Post-Fire Forest Recovery A. Larrinaga & L. Brotons 10.3390/drones3010006
10. Polymodal Method of Improving the Quality of Photogrammetric Images and Models P. Burdziakowski 10.3390/en14123457
11. Determining optimal photogrammetric adjustment of images obtained from a fixed‐wing UAV K. Pargieła & A. Rzonca 10.1111/phor.12377
12. High-Throughput Phenotyping of Plant Height: Comparing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Ground LiDAR Estimates S. Madec et al. 10.3389/fpls.2017.02002
13. Unmanned aerial vehicles can accurately, reliably, and economically compete with terrestrial mapping methods O. Thomas et al. 10.1139/juvs-2018-0030
14. UAV-Based 3D Point Clouds of Freshwater Fish Habitats, Xingu River Basin, Brazil M. Kalacska et al. 10.3390/data4010009
15. A two-step approach for the correction of rolling shutter distortion in UAV photogrammetry Y. Zhou et al. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.11.020
16. Weekly Small Uncrewed Aerial System Surveys, Structure from Motion, and Empirical Orthogonal Function Analyses Reveal Unique Modes of Sediment Exchange Generated by Seasonal and Episodic Phenomena: Waikīkī, Hawaiʻi K. McDonald et al. 10.3390/rs14205108
17. Simulation and Analysis of Photogrammetric UAV Image Blocks—Influence of Camera Calibration Error Y. Zhou et al. 10.3390/rs12010022
18. Assessment of UAV and Ground-Based Structure from Motion with Multi-View Stereo Photogrammetry in a Gullied Savanna Catchment J. Koci et al. 10.3390/ijgi6110328
19. On-Orbit Geometric Calibration and Validation of Luojia 1-01 Night-Light Satellite G. Zhang et al. 10.3390/rs11030264
20. Area-Optimized, Rapid UAV-Borne Recording of Medieval Heritage in Central Asia M. Block-Berlitz et al. 10.1080/00934690.2021.2007661
21. The Potential of LiDAR and UAV-Photogrammetric Data Analysis to Interpret Archaeological Sites: A Case Study of Chun Castle in South-West England I. Kadhim & F. Abed 10.3390/ijgi10010041
22. A critical review of UAS-based aerial photography and photogrammetry of Cahokia’s Grand Plaza J. Lambert & B. Jacob Skousen 10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103789
23. Methodology for Performing Bathymetric and Photogrammetric Measurements Using UAV and USV Vehicles in the Coastal Zone M. Specht 10.3390/rs16173328
24. Multi-Sensor UAV Tracking of Individual Seedlings and Seedling Communities at Millimetre Accuracy T. Buters et al. 10.3390/drones3040081
25. Can Low-Cost Unmanned Aerial Systems Describe the Forage Quality Heterogeneity? Insight from a Timothy Pasture Case Study in Southern Belgium A. Michez et al. 10.3390/rs12101650
26. High Throughput Field Phenotyping for Plant Height Using UAV-Based RGB Imagery in Wheat Breeding Lines: Feasibility and Validation L. Volpato et al. 10.3389/fpls.2021.591587
27. From consumer to enterprise grade: How the choice of four UAS impacts point cloud quality M. Stark et al. 10.1002/esp.5142