- Article
(1905 KB) - Metadata XML
- November 21, 2024
- |
- Home
- |
- Sitemap
- |
- The ISPRS Foundation
ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Articles | Volume V-4-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2020-147-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2020-147-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
03 Aug 2020
| 03 Aug 2020
ANT COLONY OPTIMIZATION PARAMETER SELECTION FOR SHORTEST PATH PROBLEM
N. Zarrinpanjeh
Department of Geomatics Engineering, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
F. Dadrass Javan
Department of Surveying and Geomatics Engineering, University College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Department of Geography, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
H. Azadi
Department of Geography, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
P. De Maeyer
Department of Geography, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
F. Witlox
Department of Geography, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Related authors
N. Zarrinpanjeh, F. Dadrass Javan, A. Naji, H. Azadi, P. De Maeyer, and F. Witlox
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2020, 1285–1291, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-1285-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-1285-2020, 2020
N. Zarrinpanjeh and F. Dadrassjavan
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4-W4, 299–303, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W4-299-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W4-299-2017, 2017
N. Kiaee, E. Hashemizadeh, and N. Zarrinpanjeh
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4-W4, 151–154, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W4-151-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W4-151-2017, 2017
Alexandra Aguiar Pedro, Farzaneh Dadrass Javan, Sonja Georgievska, Eduardo Hortal Pereira Barreto, Ou Ku, Felipe de Oliveira, Patricia do Prado Oliveira, and Caroline Gevaert
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-3-2024, 387–392, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-387-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-387-2024, 2024
Haiyang Shi, Geping Luo, Olaf Hellwich, Xiufeng He, Alishir Kurban, Philippe De Maeyer, and Tim Van de Voorde
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4551–4562, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4551-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4551-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Using evidence from meteorological stations, this study assessed the climatic, hydrological, and ecological aridity changes in global drylands and their associated mechanisms. A decoupling between atmospheric, hydrological, and vegetation aridity was found. This highlights the added value of using station-scale data to assess dryland change as a complement to results based on coarse-resolution reanalysis data and land surface models.
Philippe De Maeyer
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 6, 49, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-6-49-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-6-49-2023, 2023
Haiyang Shi, Geping Luo, Olaf Hellwich, Alishir Kurban, Philippe De Maeyer, and Tim Van de Voorde
Biogeosciences, 20, 2727–2741, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2727-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2727-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In studies on the relationship between ecosystem functions and climate and plant traits, previously used data-driven methods such as multiple regression and random forest may be inadequate for representing causality due to limitations such as covariance between variables. Based on FLUXNET site data, we used a causal graphical model to revisit the control of climate and vegetation traits over ecosystem functions.
F. Samadzadegan, F. Dadrass Javan, and M. Zeynalpoor Asl
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-M-2-2023, 1395–1402, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-1395-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-1395-2023, 2023
S. Motayyeb, F. Samadzadegan, F. Dadrass Javan, and H. R. Hosseinpour
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-4-W1-2022, 551–561, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-551-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-551-2023, 2023
F. Samadzadegan, F. Dadrass Javan, M. Hasanlou, M. Gholamshahi, and F. Ashtari Mahini
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-4-W1-2022, 685–690, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-685-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-685-2023, 2023
F. Samadzadegan, A. Toosi, F. Dadrass Javan, and A. Stein
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-4-W1-2022, 691–698, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-691-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-691-2023, 2023
S. Alebooye, F. Samadzadegan, and F. Dadrass Javan
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-4-W1-2022, 57–62, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-57-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-57-2023, 2023
A. Eftekhari, F. Samadzadegan, and F. Dadrass Javan
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W2-2022, 23–29, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W2-2022-23-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W2-2022-23-2023, 2023
H. R. Hosseinpour, F. Samadzadegan, F. Dadrass Javan, and S. Motayyeb
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W2-2022, 45–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W2-2022-45-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W2-2022-45-2023, 2023
Haiyang Shi, Geping Luo, Olaf Hellwich, Mingjuan Xie, Chen Zhang, Yu Zhang, Yuangang Wang, Xiuliang Yuan, Xiaofei Ma, Wenqiang Zhang, Alishir Kurban, Philippe De Maeyer, and Tim Van de Voorde
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4603–4618, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4603-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4603-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
There have been many machine learning simulation studies based on eddy-covariance observations for water flux and evapotranspiration. We performed a meta-analysis of such studies to clarify the impact of different algorithms and predictors, etc., on the reported prediction accuracy. It can, to some extent, guide future global water flux modeling studies and help us better understand the terrestrial ecosystem water cycle.
Philippe De Maeyer
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 5, 3, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-5-3-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-5-3-2022, 2022
Haiyang Shi, Geping Luo, Olaf Hellwich, Mingjuan Xie, Chen Zhang, Yu Zhang, Yuangang Wang, Xiuliang Yuan, Xiaofei Ma, Wenqiang Zhang, Alishir Kurban, Philippe De Maeyer, and Tim Van de Voorde
Biogeosciences, 19, 3739–3756, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3739-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3739-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A number of studies have been conducted by using machine learning approaches to simulate carbon fluxes. We performed a meta-analysis of these net ecosystem exchange (NEE) simulations. Random forests and support vector machines performed better than other algorithms. Models with larger timescales had a lower accuracy. For different plant functional types (PFTs), there were significant differences in the predictors used and their effects on model accuracy.
Jana Ameye, Philippe De Maeyer, Mario Hernandez, and Luc Zwartjes
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 3, 5, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-3-5-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-3-5-2021, 2021
Sara Top, Lola Kotova, Lesley De Cruz, Svetlana Aniskevich, Leonid Bobylev, Rozemien De Troch, Natalia Gnatiuk, Anne Gobin, Rafiq Hamdi, Arne Kriegsmann, Armelle Reca Remedio, Abdulla Sakalli, Hans Van De Vyver, Bert Van Schaeybroeck, Viesturs Zandersons, Philippe De Maeyer, Piet Termonia, and Steven Caluwaerts
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1267–1293, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1267-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1267-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Detailed climate data are needed to assess the impact of climate change on human and natural systems. The performance of two high-resolution regional climate models, ALARO-0 and REMO2015, was investigated over central Asia, a vulnerable region where detailed climate information is scarce. In certain subregions the produced climate data are suitable for impact studies, but bias adjustment is required for subregions where significant biases have been identified.
Haiyang Shi, Geping Luo, Hongwei Zheng, Chunbo Chen, Olaf Hellwich, Jie Bai, Tie Liu, Shuang Liu, Jie Xue, Peng Cai, Huili He, Friday Uchenna Ochege, Tim Van de Voorde, and Philippe de Maeyer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 901–925, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-901-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-901-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Some river basins are considered to be very similar because they have a similar background such as a transboundary, facing threats of human activities. But we still lack understanding of differences under their general similarities. Therefore, we proposed a framework based on a Bayesian network to group watersheds based on similarity levels and compare the causal and systematic differences within the group. We applied it to the Amu and Syr Darya River basin and discussed its universality.
E. Natsagdorj, T. Renchin, P. De Maeyer, R. Goossens, T. Van de Voorde, and B. Darkhijav
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B4-2020, 149–156, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2020-149-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2020-149-2020, 2020
N. Zarrinpanjeh, F. Dadrass Javan, A. Naji, H. Azadi, P. De Maeyer, and F. Witlox
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2020, 1285–1291, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-1285-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-1285-2020, 2020
H. Haddadi Amlashi, F. Samadzadegan, F. Dadrass Javan, and M. Savadkouhi
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B1-2020, 443–449, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2020-443-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2020-443-2020, 2020
T. Altanchimeg, T. Renchin, P. De Maeyer, E. Natsagdorj, B. Tseveen, and B. Norov
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-5-W3, 7–12, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W3-7-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W3-7-2019, 2019
F. Dadras Javan, F. S. Mortazavi, F. Moradi, and A. Toosi
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4-W18, 247–254, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-247-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-247-2019, 2019
F. Dadras Javan, F. Samadzadegan, S. Mehravar, and A. Toosi
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4-W18, 255–261, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-255-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-255-2019, 2019
F. Dadras Javan and M. Savadkouhi
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4-W18, 263–269, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-263-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-263-2019, 2019
M. Dahaghin, F. Samadzadegan, and F. Dadras Javan
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4-W18, 271–277, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-271-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-271-2019, 2019
M. Hassanpour, F. Dadras Javan, and A. Azizi
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4-W18, 467–474, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-467-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-467-2019, 2019
S. Van Ackere, J. Verbeurgt, L. De Sloover, A. De Wulf, N. Van de Weghe, and P. De Maeyer
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W8, 429–436, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W8-429-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W8-429-2019, 2019
Laure De Cock, Kristien Ooms, Nico Van de Weghe, and Philippe De Maeyer
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 1, 55, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-1-55-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-1-55-2019, 2019
Philippe De Maeyer
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 1, 56, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-1-56-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-1-56-2019, 2019
Merve Keskin, Kristien Ooms, Philippe De Maeyer, and Ahmet Ozgur Dogru
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 1, 171, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-1-171-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-1-171-2019, 2019
Lieselot Lapon, Kristien Ooms, and Philippe De Maeyer
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 1, 207, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-1-207-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-1-207-2019, 2019
Nina Vanhaeren, Kristien Ooms, and Philippe De Maeyer
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 1, 378, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-1-378-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-1-378-2019, 2019
E. Natsagdorj, T. Renchin, P. De Maeyer, B. Tseveen, C. Dari, and E. Dashdondog
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 485–491, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-485-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-485-2019, 2019
N. Zarrinpanjeh and F. Dadrassjavan
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4-W4, 299–303, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W4-299-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W4-299-2017, 2017
N. Kiaee, E. Hashemizadeh, and N. Zarrinpanjeh
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4-W4, 151–154, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W4-151-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W4-151-2017, 2017
Hanne Glas, Greet Deruyter, Philippe De Maeyer, Arpita Mandal, and Sherene James-Williamson
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2529–2542, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2529-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2529-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Adequate flood damage assessments can help to minimize damage costs in the SIDS. Data availability is, however, a major issue in these areas. In order to determine the minimal data necessary for an adequate result, a sensitivity analysis was performed on the input data. This has shown that population density, in combination with an average number of people per household, is a good parameter to determine building damage. Furthermore, a complete road dataset is visually indispensable.
H. Fazeli, F. Samadzadegan, and F. Dadrasjavan
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B6, 221–226, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B6-221-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B6-221-2016, 2016
H. R. Hosseinpoor, F. Samadzadegan, and F. Dadrasjavan
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B6, 243–249, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B6-243-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B6-243-2016, 2016
The International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing is a non-governmental organization devoted to the development of international cooperation for the advancement of photogrammetry and remote sensing and their applications. The Society operates without any discrimination on grounds of race, religion, nationality, or political philosophy.
Useful Links
Useful External Links
Our Contact
c/o
Leibniz University Hannover
Institute of Photogrammetry and GeoInformation
Nienburger Str. 1
D-30167 Hannover
GERMANY
Email: isprs-sg@isprs.org