- Article
(12727 KB) - Metadata XML
- November 21, 2024
- |
- Home
- |
- Sitemap
- |
- The ISPRS Foundation
ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Articles | Volume V-5-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-5-2020-109-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-5-2020-109-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
03 Aug 2020
| 03 Aug 2020
SEMCITY TOULOUSE: A BENCHMARK FOR BUILDING INSTANCE SEGMENTATION IN SATELLITE IMAGES
R. Roscher
Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn, Germany
Institute of Computer Science, University of Osnabrueck, Germany
Swiss Data Science Center, ETHZ and EPF Lausanne, Switzerland
C. Mallet
Univ. Gustave Eiffel, IGN-ENSG, LaSTIG/Strudel, Saint-Mandé, France
L. Drees
Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn, Germany
J. D. Wegner
EcoVision Lab, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Related authors
Clara Betancourt, Timo T. Stomberg, Ann-Kathrin Edrich, Ankit Patnala, Martin G. Schultz, Ribana Roscher, Julia Kowalski, and Scarlet Stadtler
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4331–4354, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4331-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4331-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Ozone is a toxic greenhouse gas with high spatial variability. We present a machine-learning-based ozone-mapping workflow generating a transparent and reliable product. Going beyond standard mapping methods, this work combines explainable machine learning with uncertainty assessment to increase the integrity of the produced map.
Clara Betancourt, Timo Stomberg, Ribana Roscher, Martin G. Schultz, and Scarlet Stadtler
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3013–3033, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3013-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3013-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
With the AQ-Bench dataset, we contribute to shared data usage and machine learning methods in the field of environmental science. The AQ-Bench dataset contains air quality data and metadata from more than 5500 air quality observation stations all over the world. The dataset offers a low-threshold entrance to machine learning on a real-world environmental dataset. AQ-Bench thus provides a blueprint for environmental benchmark datasets.
T. Stomberg, I. Weber, M. Schmitt, and R. Roscher
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2021, 317–324, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2021-317-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2021-317-2021, 2021
L. Drees, J. Kusche, and R. Roscher
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 813–820, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-813-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-813-2020, 2020
I. Weber, J. Bongartz, and R. Roscher
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 917–924, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-917-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-917-2020, 2020
J. Kierdorf, J. Garcke, J. Behley, T. Cheeseman, and R. Roscher
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 1005–1012, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-1005-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-1005-2020, 2020
R. Roscher, B. Bohn, M. F. Duarte, and J. Garcke
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2020, 817–824, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-817-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-817-2020, 2020
J. Oehrlein, A. Förster, D. Schunck, Y. Dehbi, R. Roscher, and J.-H. Haunert
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-4-W7, 107–114, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W7-107-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W7-107-2018, 2018
L. Drees and R. Roscher
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-1-W1, 133–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-1-W1-133-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-1-W1-133-2017, 2017
Ribana Roscher, Jan Behmann, Anne-Katrin Mahlein, Jan Dupuis, Heiner Kuhlmann, and Lutz Plümer
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., III-7, 89–96, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-III-7-89-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-III-7-89-2016, 2016
Jakob Pernov, William Aeberhard, Michele Volpi, Eliza Harris, Benjamin Hohermuth, Sakiko Ishino, Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Stephan Henne, Ulas Im, Patricia Quinn, Lucia Upchurch, and Julia Schmale
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3379, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3379, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
MSAp is a vital part of the Arctic climate system. Numerical models struggle to reproduce the seasonal cycle of MSAp. We evaluate three numerical models and one reanalysis product’s ability to simulate MSAp. We develop data-driven models for MSAp at four High Arctic stations. The data-driven models outperform the numerical models and reanalysis product and identified precursor source, chemical processing, and removal-related features as being important for modeling MSAp.
Alessandro Maissen, Frank Techel, and Michele Volpi
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7569–7593, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7569-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7569-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
By harnessing AI models, this work enables processing large amounts of data, including weather conditions, snowpack characteristics, and historical avalanche data, to predict human-like avalanche forecasts in Switzerland. Our proposed model can significantly assist avalanche forecasters in their decision-making process, thereby facilitating more efficient and accurate predictions crucial for ensuring safety in Switzerland's avalanche-prone regions.
Cristina Pérez-Guillén, Frank Techel, Michele Volpi, and Alec van Herwijnen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2374, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2374, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study assesses the performance and explainability of a random forest classifier for predicting dry-snow avalanche danger levels during initial live-testing. The model achieved ∼70 % agreement with human forecasts, performing equally well in nowcast and forecast modes, while capturing the temporal dynamics of avalanche forecasting. The explainability approach enhances the transparency of the model's decision-making process, providing a valuable tool for operational avalanche forecasting.
Jan Svoboda, Marc Ruesch, David Liechti, Corinne Jones, Michele Volpi, Michael Zehnder, and Jürg Schweizer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1752, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1752, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Accurately measuring snow height is key for modeling approaches in climate sciences, snow hydrology and avalanche forecasting. Erroneous snow height measurements often occur when the snow height is low or changes, for instance, during a snowfall in the summer. We prepare a new benchmark dataset with annotated snow height data and demonstrate how to improve the measurement quality using modern deep learning approaches. Our approach can be easily implemented into a data pipeline for snow modeling.
Andri Simeon, Cristina Pérez-Guillén, Michele Volpi, Christine Seupel, and Alec van Herwijnen
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-76, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-76, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Avalanche seismic detection systems are key for forecasting, but distinguishing avalanches from other seismic sources remains challenging. We propose novel autoencoder models to automatically extract features and compare them with standard seismic attributes. These features are then used to classify avalanches and noise events. The autoencoder feature classifiers have the highest sensitivity to detect avalanches, while the standard seismic classifier performs better overall.
Cristina Pérez-Guillén, Frank Techel, Martin Hendrick, Michele Volpi, Alec van Herwijnen, Tasko Olevski, Guillaume Obozinski, Fernando Pérez-Cruz, and Jürg Schweizer
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2031–2056, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2031-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2031-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A fully data-driven approach to predicting the danger level for dry-snow avalanche conditions in Switzerland was developed. Two classifiers were trained using a large database of meteorological data, snow cover simulations, and danger levels. The models performed well throughout the Swiss Alps, reaching a performance similar to the current experience-based avalanche forecasts. This approach shows the potential to be a valuable supplementary decision support tool for assessing avalanche hazard.
Clara Betancourt, Timo T. Stomberg, Ann-Kathrin Edrich, Ankit Patnala, Martin G. Schultz, Ribana Roscher, Julia Kowalski, and Scarlet Stadtler
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4331–4354, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4331-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4331-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Ozone is a toxic greenhouse gas with high spatial variability. We present a machine-learning-based ozone-mapping workflow generating a transparent and reliable product. Going beyond standard mapping methods, this work combines explainable machine learning with uncertainty assessment to increase the integrity of the produced map.
L. Landrieu, E. Rupnik, S. Oude Elberink, C. Mallet, and N. Paparoditis
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2022, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-1-2022, 2022
L. Landrieu, E. Rupnik, S. Oude Elberink, C. Mallet, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-4-2022, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2022-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2022-1-2022, 2022
L. Landrieu, E. Rupnik, S. Oude Elberink, C. Mallet, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-5-2022, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-5-2022-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-5-2022-1-2022, 2022
L. Landrieu, E. Rupnik, S. Oude Elberink, C. Mallet, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-1-2022, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2022-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2022-1-2022, 2022
L. Landrieu, E. Rupnik, S. Oude Elberink, C. Mallet, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2022, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-1-2022, 2022
L. Landrieu, E. Rupnik, S. Oude Elberink, C. Mallet, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2022, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-1-2022, 2022
H. Tagne, A. Le Bris, D. Monkam, and C. Mallet
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2022, 673–680, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-673-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-673-2022, 2022
Sebastian Landwehr, Michele Volpi, F. Alexander Haumann, Charlotte M. Robinson, Iris Thurnherr, Valerio Ferracci, Andrea Baccarini, Jenny Thomas, Irina Gorodetskaya, Christian Tatzelt, Silvia Henning, Rob L. Modini, Heather J. Forrer, Yajuan Lin, Nicolas Cassar, Rafel Simó, Christel Hassler, Alireza Moallemi, Sarah E. Fawcett, Neil Harris, Ruth Airs, Marzieh H. Derkani, Alberto Alberello, Alessandro Toffoli, Gang Chen, Pablo Rodríguez-Ros, Marina Zamanillo, Pau Cortés-Greus, Lei Xue, Conor G. Bolas, Katherine C. Leonard, Fernando Perez-Cruz, David Walton, and Julia Schmale
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 1295–1369, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1295-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1295-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition surveyed a large number of variables describing the dynamic state of ocean and atmosphere, freshwater cycle, atmospheric chemistry, ocean biogeochemistry, and microbiology in the Southern Ocean. To reduce the dimensionality of the dataset, we apply a sparse principal component analysis and identify temporal patterns from diurnal to seasonal cycles, as well as geographical gradients and
hotspotsof interaction. Code and data are open access.
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, T. Wu, G. Bahl, M. Yu, A. Garioud, Y. Chen, S. Jiang, M. Y. Yang, and N. Paparoditis
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B4-2021, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2021-1-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2021-1-2021, 2021
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, T. Wu, G. Bahl, M. Yu, A. Garioud, Y. Chen, S. Jiang, M. Y. Yang, and N. Paparoditis
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B5-2021, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B5-2021-1-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B5-2021-1-2021, 2021
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, T. Wu, G. Bahl, M. Yu, A. Garioud, Y. Chen, S. Jiang, M. Y. Yang, and N. Paparoditis
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B1-2021, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2021-1-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2021-1-2021, 2021
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, T. Wu, G. Bahl, M. Yu, A. Garioud, Y. Chen, S. Jiang, M. Y. Yang, and N. Paparoditis
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2021, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-1-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-1-2021, 2021
O. Ennafii, A. Le Bris, F. Lafarge, and C. Mallet
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2021, 329–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-329-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-329-2021, 2021
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, T. Wu, G. Bahl, M. Yu, M. Garioud, Y. Chen, S. Jiang, M. Y. Yang, and N. Paparoditis
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-1-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-1-2021, 2021
Clara Betancourt, Timo Stomberg, Ribana Roscher, Martin G. Schultz, and Scarlet Stadtler
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3013–3033, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3013-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3013-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
With the AQ-Bench dataset, we contribute to shared data usage and machine learning methods in the field of environmental science. The AQ-Bench dataset contains air quality data and metadata from more than 5500 air quality observation stations all over the world. The dataset offers a low-threshold entrance to machine learning on a real-world environmental dataset. AQ-Bench thus provides a blueprint for environmental benchmark datasets.
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, T. Wu, G. Bahl, M. Yu, A. Garioud, Y. Chen, S. Jiang, M. Y. Yang, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-1-2021, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2021-1-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2021-1-2021, 2021
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, T. Wu, G. Bahl, M. Yu, A. Garioud, Y. Chen, S. Jiang, M. Y. Yang, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2021, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2021-1-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2021-1-2021, 2021
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, T. Wu, G. Bahl, M. Yu, A. Garioud, Y. Chen, S. Jiang, M. Y. Yang, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2021, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2021-1-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2021-1-2021, 2021
T. Stomberg, I. Weber, M. Schmitt, and R. Roscher
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2021, 317–324, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2021-317-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2021-317-2021, 2021
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, T. Wu, G. Bahl, M. Yu, A. Garioud, Y. Chen, S. Jiang, M. Y. Yang, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-4-2021, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2021-1-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2021-1-2021, 2021
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, T. Wu, G. Bahl, M. Yu, A. Garioud, Y. Chen, S. Jiang, M. Y. Yang, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-5-2021, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-5-2021-1-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-5-2021-1-2021, 2021
Nico Lang, Andrea Irniger, Agnieszka Rozniak, Roni Hunziker, Jan Dirk Wegner, and Konrad Schindler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2567–2597, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2567-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2567-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Grain size analysis is the key to understanding the sediment dynamics of river systems and is an important indicator for mitigating flood risk and preserving biodiversity in aquatic habitats. We propose GRAINet, a data-driven approach based on deep learning, to regress grain size distributions from georeferenced UAV images. This allows for a holistic analysis of entire gravel bars, resulting in robust grading curves and high-resolution maps of spatial grain size distribution at large scale.
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, E. Rupnik, G. Bahl, N. Girard, A. Garioud, I. Dowman, and N. Paparoditis
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B4-2020, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2020-1-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2020-1-2020, 2020
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, E. Rupnik, G. Bahl, N. Girard, A. Garioud, I. Dowman, and N. Paparoditis
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B5-2020, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B5-2020-1-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B5-2020-1-2020, 2020
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, E. Rupnik, G. Bahl, N. Girard, A. Garioud, I. Dowman, and N. Paparoditis
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2020, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-1-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-1-2020, 2020
A. Garioud, S. Valero, S. Giordano, and C. Mallet
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2020, 591–598, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-591-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-591-2020, 2020
H. Tagne, A. Le Bris, D. Monkam, and C. Mallet
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2020, 633–640, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-633-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-633-2020, 2020
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, E. Rupnik, G. Bahl, N. Girard, A. Garioud, I. Dowman, and N. Paparoditis
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2020, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-1-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-1-2020, 2020
C. Mallet and A. Le Bris
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2020, 703–710, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-703-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-703-2020, 2020
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, E. Rupnik, G. Bahl, N. Girard, A. Garioud, I. Dowman, and N. Paparoditis
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B1-2020, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2020-1-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2020-1-2020, 2020
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, E. Rupnik, G. Bahl, N. Girard, A. Garioud, I. Dowman, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-1-2020, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2020-1-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2020-1-2020, 2020
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, E. Rupnik, G. Bahl, N. Girard, A. Garioud, I. Dowman, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-1-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-1-2020, 2020
L. Drees, J. Kusche, and R. Roscher
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 813–820, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-813-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-813-2020, 2020
I. Weber, J. Bongartz, and R. Roscher
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 917–924, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-917-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-917-2020, 2020
J. Kierdorf, J. Garcke, J. Behley, T. Cheeseman, and R. Roscher
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 1005–1012, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-1005-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-1005-2020, 2020
A. Le Bris, S. Giordano, and C. Mallet
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 1013–1019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-1013-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-1013-2020, 2020
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, E. Rupnik, G. Bahl, N. Girard, A. Garioud, I. Dowman, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2020, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-1-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-1-2020, 2020
R. Roscher, B. Bohn, M. F. Duarte, and J. Garcke
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2020, 817–824, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-817-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-817-2020, 2020
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, E. Rupnik, G. Bahl, N. Girard, A. Garioud, I. Dowman, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-4-2020, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2020-1-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2020-1-2020, 2020
C. Mallet, F. Lafarge, M. Poreba, E. Rupnik, G. Bahl, N. Girard, A. Garioud, I. Dowman, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-5-2020, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-5-2020-1-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-5-2020-1-2020, 2020
Matthew Moy de Vitry, Simon Kramer, Jan Dirk Wegner, and João P. Leitão
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4621–4634, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4621-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4621-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This work demonstrates a new approach to obtain flood level trend information from surveillance footage with minimal prior information. A neural network trained to detect flood water is applied to video frames to create a qualitative flooding metric (namely, SOFI). The correlation between the real water trend and SOFI was found to be 75 % on average (based on six videos of flooding under various circumstances). SOFI could be used for flood model calibration, to increase model reliability.
P. Chaudhary, S. D’Aronco, M. Moy de Vitry, J. P. Leitão, and J. D. Wegner
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 5–12, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-5-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-5-2019, 2019
C. Mallet, I. Dowman, G. Vosselman, U. Stilla, L. Halounova, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-5, 53–58, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-5-53-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-5-53-2018, 2018
J. Oehrlein, A. Förster, D. Schunck, Y. Dehbi, R. Roscher, and J.-H. Haunert
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-4-W7, 107–114, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W7-107-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W7-107-2018, 2018
S. Giordano, A. Le Bris, and C. Mallet
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2, 105–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-105-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-105-2018, 2018
C. Stucker, A. Richard, J. D. Wegner, and K. Schindler
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2, 263–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-263-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-263-2018, 2018
W. Ouerghemmi, A. Le Bris, N. Chehata, and C. Mallet
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-1-W1, 167–174, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-W1-167-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-W1-167-2017, 2017
L. Drees and R. Roscher
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-1-W1, 133–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-1-W1-133-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-1-W1-133-2017, 2017
Ribana Roscher, Jan Behmann, Anne-Katrin Mahlein, Jan Dupuis, Heiner Kuhlmann, and Lutz Plümer
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., III-7, 89–96, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-III-7-89-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-III-7-89-2016, 2016
The International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing is a non-governmental organization devoted to the development of international cooperation for the advancement of photogrammetry and remote sensing and their applications. The Society operates without any discrimination on grounds of race, religion, nationality, or political philosophy.
Useful Links
Useful External Links
Our Contact
c/o
Leibniz University Hannover
Institute of Photogrammetry and GeoInformation
Nienburger Str. 1
D-30167 Hannover
GERMANY
Email: isprs-sg@isprs.org