- Article
(1185 KB) - Metadata XML
- November 23, 2024
- |
- Home
- |
- Sitemap
- |
- The ISPRS Foundation
ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Articles | Volume IV-3/W2-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-125-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-125-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
29 Oct 2020
| 29 Oct 2020
CALVING DYNAMICS DERIVED FROM SATELLITE SAR DATA IN SUPPORT OF MASS BALANCE ESTIMATIONS IN LANGE GLACIER, ANTARCTICA
E. Johnson
German Aerospace Center (DLR), Remote sensing Institute (IMF), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile
D. Floricioiu
German Aerospace Center (DLR), Remote sensing Institute (IMF), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
E. Schwalbe
Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
R. Koschitzki
Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
H.-G. Maas
Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
C. Cardenas
Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile
G. Casassa
Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile
Related authors
C. Cárdenas, G. Casassa, X. Aguilar, D. Mojica, E. Johnson, and F. Brondi
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-3-W2-2020, 119–123, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-119-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-119-2020, 2020
E. Schwalbe, R. Koschitzki, E. Johnson, D. F. Mojica Moncada, B. Schröter, C. Cardenas, G. Casassa, and H.-G. Maas
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-3-W2-2020, 129–131, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-129-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-129-2020, 2020
L. Krieger, E. Johnson, and D. Floricioiu
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-3-W2-2020, 133–136, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-133-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-133-2020, 2020
Livia Piermattei, Michael Zemp, Christian Sommer, Fanny Brun, Matthias H. Braun, Liss M. Andreassen, Joaquín M. C. Belart, Etienne Berthier, Atanu Bhattacharya, Laura Boehm Vock, Tobias Bolch, Amaury Dehecq, Inés Dussaillant, Daniel Falaschi, Caitlyn Florentine, Dana Floricioiu, Christian Ginzler, Gregoire Guillet, Romain Hugonnet, Matthias Huss, Andreas Kääb, Owen King, Christoph Klug, Friedrich Knuth, Lukas Krieger, Jeff La Frenierre, Robert McNabb, Christopher McNeil, Rainer Prinz, Louis Sass, Thorsten Seehaus, David Shean, Désirée Treichler, Anja Wendt, and Ruitang Yang
The Cryosphere, 18, 3195–3230, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3195-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3195-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Satellites have made it possible to observe glacier elevation changes from all around the world. In the present study, we compared the results produced from two different types of satellite data between different research groups and against validation measurements from aeroplanes. We found a large spread between individual results but showed that the group ensemble can be used to reliably estimate glacier elevation changes and related errors from satellite data.
Anne Bienert, Katja Richter, Sophia Boehme, and Hans-Gerd Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-2-2024, 33–40, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-2024-33-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-2024-33-2024, 2024
Christian Mulsow, Hannes Sardemann, Laure-Anne Gueguen, Gottfried Mandelburger, and Hans-Gerd Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-2-2024, 289–295, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-2024-289-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-2024-289-2024, 2024
Katja Richter, David Mader, Hannes Sardemann, and Hans-Gerd Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-2-2024, 341–348, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-2024-341-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-2024-341-2024, 2024
Hannes Sardemann, Christian Mulsow, Laure-Anne Gueguen, Gottfried Mandlburger, and Hans-Gerd Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-2-2024, 363–369, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-2024-363-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-2024-363-2024, 2024
Robert Blaskow and Hans-Gerd Maas
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-2-2024, 9–16, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-9-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-9-2024, 2024
Melanie Elias, Steffen Isfort, Anette Eltner, and Hans-Gerd Maas
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-2-2024, 57–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-57-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-57-2024, 2024
Steffen Isfort, Melanie Elias, and Hans-Gerd Maas
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-2-2024, 113–120, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-113-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-113-2024, 2024
Sindhu Ramanath Tarekere, Lukas Krieger, Dana Floricioiu, and Konrad Heidler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-223, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-223, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Grounding lines are geophysical features that divide ice masses on the bedrock and floating ice shelves. Their accurate location is required for calculating the mass balance of ice sheets and glaciers in Antarctica and Greenland. Human experts still manually detect them in satellite-based interferometric radar images, which is inefficient given the growing volume of data. We have developed an artificial intelligence-based automatic detection algorithm to generate Antarctic-wide grounding lines.
F. Wagner and H.-G. Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W2-2023, 1667–1676, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-1667-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-1667-2023, 2023
Hannah J. Picton, Chris R. Stokes, Stewart S. R. Jamieson, Dana Floricioiu, and Lukas Krieger
The Cryosphere, 17, 3593–3616, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3593-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3593-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides an overview of recent ice dynamics within Vincennes Bay, Wilkes Land, East Antarctica. This region was recently discovered to be vulnerable to intrusions of warm water capable of driving basal melt. Our results show extensive grounding-line retreat at Vanderford Glacier, estimated at 18.6 km between 1996 and 2020. This supports the notion that the warm water is able to access deep cavities below the Vanderford Ice Shelf, potentially making Vanderford Glacier unstable.
F. Liebold and H.-G. Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-2-W2-2022, 61–68, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W2-2022-61-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W2-2022-61-2022, 2022
S. Isfort, F. Maiwald, C. Mulsow, and H.-G. Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B1-2022, 113–119, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2022-113-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2022-113-2022, 2022
M. Jarzabek-Rychard and H.-G. Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2022, 395–400, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-395-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-395-2022, 2022
K. Richter, D. Mader, P. Westfeld, and H.-G. Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2022, 945–951, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-945-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-945-2022, 2022
M. Jarząbek-Rychard and H-G. Maas
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., VIII-5-W1-2022, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-VIII-5-W1-2022-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-VIII-5-W1-2022-1-2022, 2022
Yuting Dong, Ji Zhao, Dana Floricioiu, Lukas Krieger, Thomas Fritz, and Michael Eineder
The Cryosphere, 15, 4421–4443, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4421-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4421-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We generated a consistent, gapless and high-resolution (12 m) topography product of the Antarctic Peninsula by combining the complementary advantages of the two most recent high-resolution digital elevation model (DEM) products: the TanDEM-X DEM and the Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica. The generated DEM maintains the characteristics of the TanDEM-X DEM, has a better quality due to the correction of the residual height errors in the non-edited TanDEM-X DEM and will be freely available.
Helmut Rott, Stefan Scheiblauer, Jan Wuite, Lukas Krieger, Dana Floricioiu, Paola Rizzoli, Ludivine Libert, and Thomas Nagler
The Cryosphere, 15, 4399–4419, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4399-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4399-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We studied relations between interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) signals and snow–firn properties and tested procedures for correcting the penetration bias of InSAR digital elevation models at Union Glacier, Antarctica. The work is based on SAR data of the TanDEM-X mission, topographic data from optical sensors and field measurements. We provide new insights on radar signal interactions with polar snow and show the performance of penetration bias retrievals using InSAR coherence.
Lukas Müller, Martin Horwath, Mirko Scheinert, Christoph Mayer, Benjamin Ebermann, Dana Floricioiu, Lukas Krieger, Ralf Rosenau, and Saurabh Vijay
The Cryosphere, 15, 3355–3375, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3355-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3355-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Harald Moltke Bræ, a marine-terminating glacier in north-western Greenland, undergoes remarkable surges of episodic character. Our data show that a recent surge from 2013 to 2019 was initiated at the glacier front and exhibits a pronounced seasonality with flow velocities varying by 1 order of magnitude, which has not been observed at Harald Moltke Bræ in this way before. These findings are crucial for understanding surge mechanisms at Harald Moltke Bræ and other marine-terminating glaciers.
R. Blaskow and E. Schwalbe
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B1-2021, 93–96, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2021-93-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2021-93-2021, 2021
F. Liebold, R. Lorenzoni, I. Curosu, F. Léonard, V. Mechtcherine, S. Paciornik, and H.-G. Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2021, 533–539, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-533-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-533-2021, 2021
K. Richter, D. Mader, P. Westfeld, and H.-G. Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2021, 681–688, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-681-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-681-2021, 2021
H. Sardemann, C. Mulsow, and H.-G. Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2021, 689–692, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-689-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-689-2021, 2021
J. I. Cañete, C. Cárdenas, M. Frangópulos, X. Aguilar, and J. Díaz-Ochoa
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W12-2020, 385–388, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W12-2020-385-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W12-2020-385-2020, 2020
A. C. M. Luzardi and C. Cárdenas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W12-2020, 453–458, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W12-2020-453-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W12-2020-453-2020, 2020
E. Spyrakos, P. Hunter, S. Simis, C. Neil, C. Riddick, S. Wang, A. Varley, M. Blake, S. Groom, J. Torres Palenzuela, L. Vilas Gonzalez, C. Cardenas, M. Frangopulos, X. Aguilar Vega, J. L. Iriarte, and A. Tyler
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-3-W2-2020, 101–106, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-101-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-101-2020, 2020
C. Cárdenas, G. Casassa, X. Aguilar, D. Mojica, E. Johnson, and F. Brondi
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-3-W2-2020, 119–123, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-119-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-119-2020, 2020
E. Schwalbe, R. Koschitzki, E. Johnson, D. F. Mojica Moncada, B. Schröter, C. Cardenas, G. Casassa, and H.-G. Maas
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-3-W2-2020, 129–131, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-129-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-129-2020, 2020
L. Krieger, E. Johnson, and D. Floricioiu
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-3-W2-2020, 133–136, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-133-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-133-2020, 2020
O. Monserrat, C. Cardenas, P. Olea, V. Krishnakumar, and B. Crippa
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-3-W2-2020, 137–142, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-137-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W2-2020-137-2020, 2020
M. Elias and H.-G. Maas
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-1-2020, 181–187, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2020-181-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2020-181-2020, 2020
C. Mulsow, G. Mandlburger, and H.-G. Maas
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 671–677, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-671-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-671-2020, 2020
Ian Joughin, David E. Shean, Benjamin E. Smith, and Dana Floricioiu
The Cryosphere, 14, 211–227, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-211-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-211-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Jakobshavn Isbræ, considered to be Greenland's fastest glacier, has varied its speed and thinned dramatically since the 1990s. Here we examine the glacier's behaviour over the last decade to better understand this behaviour. We find that when the floating ice (mélange) in front of the glacier freezes in place during the winter, it can control the glacier's speed and thinning rate. A recently colder ocean has strengthened this mélange, allowing the glacier to recoup some of its previous losses.
F. Liebold, H.-G. Maas, and A. A. Heravi
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W18, 107–113, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W18-107-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W18-107-2019, 2019
Wael Abdel Jaber, Helmut Rott, Dana Floricioiu, Jan Wuite, and Nuno Miranda
The Cryosphere, 13, 2511–2535, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2511-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2511-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We use topographic maps from two radar remote-sensing missions to map surface elevation changes of the northern and southern Patagonian ice fields (NPI and SPI) for two epochs (2000–2012 and 2012–2016). We find a heterogeneous pattern of thinning within the ice fields and a varying temporal trend, which may be explained by complex interdependence between surface mass balance and effects of flow dynamics. The contribution to sea level rise amounts to 0.05 mm a−1 for both ice fields for 2000–2016.
T. Kaiser, C. Clemen, and H.-G. Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-5-W2, 35–39, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W2-35-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W2-35-2019, 2019
D. Mader, K. Richter, P. Westfeld, R. Weiß, and H.-G. Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1053–1059, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1053-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1053-2019, 2019
D. Lin, Z. Dong, X. Zhang, and H.-G. Maas
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 45–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-45-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-45-2019, 2019
S. C. L. Ribeiro, M. Jarzabek-Rychard, J. P. Cintra, and H.-G. Maas
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 437–444, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-437-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-437-2019, 2019
H.-G. Maas, D. Mader, K. Richter, and P. Westfeld
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W10, 113–117, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W10-113-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W10-113-2019, 2019
M. Kröhnert, R. Anderson, J. Bumberger, P. Dietrich, W. S. Harpole, and H.-G. Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 539–542, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-539-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-539-2018, 2018
D. Lin, M. Jarzabek-Rychard, D. Schneider, and H.-G. Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 585–591, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-585-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-585-2018, 2018
C. Mulsow, R. Kenner, Y. Bühler, A. Stoffel, and H.-G. Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 739–744, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-739-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-739-2018, 2018
K. Richter, D. Mader, P. Westfeld, and H.-G. Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 961–967, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-961-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-961-2018, 2018
H. Sardemann, A. Eltner, and H.-G. Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 1023–1027, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1023-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1023-2018, 2018
E. Watson, H.-G. Maas, F. Schäfer, and S. Hiermaier
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 1175–1181, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1175-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1175-2018, 2018
F. Liebold and H.-G. Maas
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2, 193–200, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-193-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-193-2018, 2018
D. Lin, A. Eltner, H. Sardemann, and H.-G. Maas
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2, 201–208, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-201-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-201-2018, 2018
Ellen Schwalbe and Hans-Gerd Maas
Earth Surf. Dynam., 5, 861–879, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-861-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-861-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The simple use of time-lapse cameras as a visual observation tool may already be a great help for environmental investigations. However, beyond that, they have the potential to also deliver precise measurements with high temporal and spatial resolution when applying appropriate processing techniques. In this paper we introduce a method for the determination of glacier motion fields from time-lapse images, but it might also be adapted for other environmental motion analysis tasks.
Wolfgang Rack, Matt A. King, Oliver J. Marsh, Christian T. Wild, and Dana Floricioiu
The Cryosphere, 11, 2481–2490, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2481-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2481-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Predicting changes of the Antarctic Ice Sheet involves fully understanding ice dynamics at the transition between grounded and floating ice. We map tidal bending of ice by satellite using InSAR, and we use precise GPS measurements with assumptions of tidal elastic bending to better interpret the satellite signal. It allows us to better define the grounding-line position and to refine the shape of tidal flexure profiles.
J. Zhao and D. Floricioiu
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 1593–1600, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1593-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1593-2017, 2017
E. Schwalbe, R. Koschitzki, and H.-G. Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B8, 537–543, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-537-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-537-2016, 2016
O. J. Marsh, W. Rack, D. Floricioiu, N. R. Golledge, and W. Lawson
The Cryosphere, 7, 1375–1384, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1375-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1375-2013, 2013
The International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing is a non-governmental organization devoted to the development of international cooperation for the advancement of photogrammetry and remote sensing and their applications. The Society operates without any discrimination on grounds of race, religion, nationality, or political philosophy.
Useful Links
Useful External Links
Our Contact
c/o
Leibniz University Hannover
Institute of Photogrammetry and GeoInformation
Nienburger Str. 1
D-30167 Hannover
GERMANY
Email: isprs-sg@isprs.org